[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f2cc4d67-8acc-1b80-edd7-23336beea4c1@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:27:14 -0500
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, jpoimboe@...hat.com, jthierry@...hat.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: Implement frame types
On 3/19/21 11:20 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:02:52AM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
>> On 3/19/21 9:40 AM, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
>
>>> Actually now I look again it's just not adding anything on EL2 entries
>>> at all, they use a separate set of macros which aren't updated - this
>>> will only update things for EL0 and EL1 entries so my comment above
>>> about this tracking EL2 as EL1 isn't accurate.
>
>> So, do I need to do anything here?
>
> Probably worth some note somewhere about other stack types existing and
> how they end up being handled, in the changelog at least.
>
OK.
Madhavan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists