[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1616122734-11581-1-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:58:54 +0800
From: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
To: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
Subject: [PATCH] dma-buf: use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up_state()
Using wake_up_process() is more simpler and friendly,
and it is more convenient for analysis and statistics
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
index 7475e09..de51326
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ dma_fence_default_wait_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
struct default_wait_cb *wait =
container_of(cb, struct default_wait_cb, base);
- wake_up_state(wait->task, TASK_NORMAL);
+ wake_up_process(wait->task);
}
/**
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists