linux-kernel - Re:Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AIMA-gACDpJ6SVEuUZslk4pC.3.1616141832486.Hmail.wangqing@vivo.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:17:12 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From:   王擎 <wangqing@...o.com>
To:     Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up_state()


>> Using wake_up_process() is more simpler and friendly,
>> and it is more convenient for analysis and statistics
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
>
>Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
>
>Should I pick it up or do you want to push it through some other tree 
>than DRM?

Pick it up just fine, thanks,
WangQing.

>
>Thanks,
>Christian.