linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72nKJBVsuvqr17qa0xnkQTUz9aaAGRi8SfXZAn-G=RYQXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 20 Mar 2021 07:07:57 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au>
Cc:     Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@...reload.com>,
        Finn Behrens <me@...enk.de>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>,
        Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@...il.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 19

On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 6:33 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au> wrote:
>
> Daniel Axtens reported the same breakage on powerpc.  I bisected it to
> the same commit.  More experimentation shows that if you reverse just
> the change to include/linux/moduleparam.h the above warnings go away.
> So
>
> -#define MAX_PARAM_PREFIX_LEN (256 - sizeof(unsigned long))
> +#define MAX_PARAM_PREFIX_LEN (64 - sizeof(unsigned long))
>
> fixes it up.  Not sure what that does to the rust support ...

Sorry for that, and thanks a lot for taking a look. For the Rust
support I had to increase a few limits, mainly the symbol length. Let
me check and I'll report back.

Cheers,
Miguel