[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFiT4/mmisnBFJ96@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:56:03 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@...italocean.com>,
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@...italocean.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Vineeth Pillai <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
keescook@...omium.org, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, vineeth@...byteword.org,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Agata Gruza <agata.gruza@...el.com>,
Antonio Gomez Iglesias <antonio.gomez.iglesias@...el.com>,
graf@...zon.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, dfaggioli@...e.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, benbjiang@...cent.com,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, OWeisse@...ch.edu,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...cle.com>, chris.hyser@...cle.com,
Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] sched: migration changes for core scheduling
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:31:09PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> Please let me know if I put cookie match check at the right position
> in task_hot(), if so, I'll obtain some performance data of it.
>
> Thanks,
> -Aubrey
>
> =======================================================
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 7f2fb08..d4bdcf9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1912,6 +1912,13 @@ static void task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_numa_env *env,
> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, env->p->cpus_ptr))
> continue;
>
> + /*
> + * Skip this cpu if source task's cookie does not match
> + * with CPU's core cookie.
> + */
> + if (!sched_core_cookie_match(cpu_rq(cpu), env->p))
> + continue;
> +
> env->dst_cpu = cpu;
> if (task_numa_compare(env, taskimp, groupimp, maymove))
> break;
This one might need a little help too, I've not fully considered NUMA
balancing though.
> @@ -6109,7 +6120,9 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
> for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
> if (!--nr)
> return -1;
> - if (available_idle_cpu(cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
> +
> + if ((available_idle_cpu(cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(cpu)) &&
> + sched_cpu_cookie_match(cpu_rq(cpu), p))
> break;
> }
>
This doesn't even apply... That code has changed.
> @@ -7427,6 +7440,14 @@ static int task_hot(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
>
> if (sysctl_sched_migration_cost == -1)
> return 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * Don't migrate task if the task's cookie does not match
> + * with the destination CPU's core cookie.
> + */
> + if (!sched_core_cookie_match(cpu_rq(env->dst_cpu), p))
> + return 1;
> +
> if (sysctl_sched_migration_cost == 0)
> return 0;
>
Should work I think, but you've put it in a weird spot for breaking up
that sysctl_sched_migration_cost thing. I'd have put it either in front
or after that other SMT thing we have there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists