[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210322172241.GB80352@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:22:41 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+f09a12b2c77bfbbf51bd@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] upstream boot error: WARNING in __context_tracking_enter
Hi Russell,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:10:43AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:54:48AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > .On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:44 AM syzbot
> > <syzbot+f09a12b2c77bfbbf51bd@...kaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> > > syzbot found the following issue on:
> > >
> > > HEAD commit: 8b12a62a Merge tag 'drm-fixes-2021-03-19' of git://anongit..
> > > git tree: upstream
> > > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17e815aed00000
> > > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=cfeed364fc353c32
> > > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f09a12b2c77bfbbf51bd
> > > userspace arch: arm
> > >
> > > IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> > > Reported-by: syzbot+f09a12b2c77bfbbf51bd@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> >
> >
> > +Mark, arm
> > It did not get far with CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE (kernel doesn't boot).
>
> It seems that the path:
>
> context_tracking_user_enter()
> user_enter()
> context_tracking_enter()
> __context_tracking_enter()
> vtime_user_enter()
>
> expects preemption to be disabled. It effectively is, because local
> interrupts are disabled by context_tracking_enter().
>
> However, the requirement for preemption to be disabled is not
> documented... so shrug. Maybe someone can say what the real requirements
> are here.
>From dealing with this recently on arm64, theis is a bit messy. To
handle this robustly we need to do a few things in sequence, including
using the *_irqoff() variants of the context_tracking_user_*()
functions.
I wrote down the constraints in commit:
23529049c6842382 ("arm64: entry: fix non-NMI user<->kernel transitions")
For user->kernel transitions, the arch code needs the following sequence
before invoking arbitrary kernel C code:
lockdep_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0);
user_exit_irqoff();
trace_hardirqs_off_finish();
For kernel->user transitions, the arch code needs the following sequence
once it will no longer invoke arbitrary kernel C code, just before
returning to userspace:
trace_hardirqs_on_prepare();
lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(CALLER_ADDR0);
user_enter_irqoff();
lockdep_hardirqs_on(CALLER_ADDR0);
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists