linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ftrace: shut up -Wcast-function-type warning for ftrace_ops_no

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210322180040.77a00e86@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:00:40 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: shut up -Wcast-function-type warning for
 ftrace_ops_no_ops

On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 22:49:58 +0100
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:

> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> 
> With 'make W=1', gcc warns about casts between incompatible function
> types:
> 
> kernel/trace/ftrace.c:128:31: error: cast between incompatible function types from 'void (*)(long unsigned int,  long unsigned int)' to 'void (*)(long unsigned int,  long unsigned int,  struct ftrace_ops *, struct ftrace_regs *)' [-Werror=cast-function-type]
>   128 | #define ftrace_ops_list_func ((ftrace_func_t)ftrace_ops_no_ops)
>       |                               ^
> 
> As the commet here explains, this one was intentional, so shut up the
> warning harder by using a double cast.

Bonus points for reading the comment ;-)

I'll take this patch for the next merge window, thanks!

-- Steve