[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFmbHI4hnKg5UH2M@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:39:08 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: shut up -Wcast-function-type warning for
ftrace_ops_no_ops
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:49:58PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> With 'make W=1', gcc warns about casts between incompatible function
> types:
>
> kernel/trace/ftrace.c:128:31: error: cast between incompatible function types from 'void (*)(long unsigned int, long unsigned int)' to 'void (*)(long unsigned int, long unsigned int, struct ftrace_ops *, struct ftrace_regs *)' [-Werror=cast-function-type]
> 128 | #define ftrace_ops_list_func ((ftrace_func_t)ftrace_ops_no_ops)
> | ^
>
> As the commet here explains, this one was intentional, so shut up the
> warning harder by using a double cast.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index 4d8e35575549..d8fc87a17421 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static void ftrace_ops_list_func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> #else
> /* See comment below, where ftrace_ops_list_func is defined */
> static void ftrace_ops_no_ops(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip);
> -#define ftrace_ops_list_func ((ftrace_func_t)ftrace_ops_no_ops)
> +#define ftrace_ops_list_func ((ftrace_func_t)(void *)ftrace_ops_no_ops)
So now we're making perfectly fine code worse, because GCC is stupid?
Please just kill the warning, like we do with so many other warnings.
It's broken!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists