[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210323150604.GB8931@li-24c3614c-2adc-11b2-a85c-85f334518bdb.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:06:04 -0500
From: "Paul A. Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv4 00/19] perf metric: Add support to reuse metric
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:36:23AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 01/08/2020 12:40, Paul A. Clarke wrote:
> > > v4 changes:
> > > - removed acks from patch because it changed a bit
> > > with the last fixes:
> > > perf metric: Collect referenced metrics in struct metric_ref_node
> > > - fixed runtime metrics [Kajol Jain]
> > > - increased recursion depth [Paul A. Clarke]
> > > - changed patches due to dependencies:
> > > perf metric: Collect referenced metrics in struct metric_ref_node
> > > perf metric: Add recursion check when processing nested metrics
> > > perf metric: Rename struct egroup to metric
> > > perf metric: Rename group_list to metric_list
> > >
> > > Also available in here:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git
> > > perf/metric
> > I built and ran from the above git branch, and things seem to work.
> > Indeed, I was able to apply my changes to exploit the new capabilities
> > via modifications to tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/powerpc/power9/metrics.json,
> > as I posted earlier (and will submit once this set gets merged).
> I was just wondering: Does perf subtest 10.3 work ok for you with the metric
> reuse?
>
> That's "Parsing of PMU event table metrics" subtest.
I confess I'm not sure what you are asking. Using the latest mainline
(84196390620ac0e5070ae36af84c137c6216a7dc), perf subtest 10.3 does
pass for me:
--
$ ./perf test 10
10: PMU events :
10.1: PMU event table sanity : Ok
10.2: PMU event map aliases : Ok
10.3: Parsing of PMU event table metrics : Ok
10.4: Parsing of PMU event table metrics with fake PMUs : Ok
--
PC
Powered by blists - more mailing lists