lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9532af0-4539-960d-dd7a-78c8731ba2f6@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:03:24 -0400
From:   "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 3/5] perf/x86/lbr: Move cpuc->lbr_xsave
 allocation out of sleeping region



On 3/23/2021 5:41 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:06:33PM +0800, Like Xu wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
>> index 18df17129695..a4ce669cc78d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
>> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ set_ext_hw_attr(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, struct perf_event *event)
>>   	return x86_pmu_extra_regs(val, event);
>>   }
>>   
>> -int x86_reserve_hardware(void)
>> +int x86_reserve_hardware(struct perf_event *event)
>>   {
>>   	int err = 0;
>>   
>> @@ -382,8 +382,10 @@ int x86_reserve_hardware(void)
>>   		if (atomic_read(&pmc_refcount) == 0) {
>>   			if (!reserve_pmc_hardware())
>>   				err = -EBUSY;
>> -			else
>> +			else {
>>   				reserve_ds_buffers();
>> +				reserve_lbr_buffers(event);
>> +			}
>>   		}
>>   		if (!err)
>>   			atomic_inc(&pmc_refcount);
> 
> This makes absolutely no sense what so ever. This is only executed for
> the first event that gets here.
> 

The LBR xsave buffer is a per-CPU buffer, not a per-event buffer. I 
think we only need to allocate the buffer once when initializing the 
first event.

Thanks,
Kan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ