[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7ci7qj47xDC3z2AzYGjnFdPRNsuEPGivZ1_re-XGhoBwMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:32:41 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 3/5] perf/x86/lbr: Move cpuc->lbr_xsave
allocation out of sleeping region
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 3:14 PM Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> +void reserve_lbr_buffers(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache = x86_get_pmu()->task_ctx_cache;
> + struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc;
> + int cpu;
> +
> + if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
> + return;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + cpuc = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events, cpu);
> + if (kmem_cache && !cpuc->lbr_xsave && !event->attr.precise_ip)
> + cpuc->lbr_xsave = kmem_cache_alloc(kmem_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> + }
> +}
I think we should use kmem_cache_alloc_node().
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists