[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210323034717.12818-1-lyl2019@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 20:47:17 -0700
From: Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] usb: Add data checks in usbtmc_disconnect
In usbtmc_disconnect, data is got from intf with the
initial reference. There is no refcount inc operation
before usbmc_free_int(data). In usbmc_free_int(data),
the data may be freed.
But later in usbtmc_disconnect, there is another put
function of data. I think it is better to add necessary
checks to avoid the data being put twice. It could cause
errors in race.
Signed-off-by: Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
---
drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c b/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
index 74d5a9c5238a..e0438cb46386 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
@@ -2494,7 +2494,9 @@ static void usbtmc_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf)
}
mutex_unlock(&data->io_mutex);
usbtmc_free_int(data);
- kref_put(&data->kref, usbtmc_delete);
+
+ if (data->iin_ep_present && data->iin_urb)
+ kref_put(&data->kref, usbtmc_delete);
}
static void usbtmc_draw_down(struct usbtmc_file_data *file_data)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists