linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] PM / devfreq: a few small fixes and improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ffcd13a3-68cd-9b57-1fae-ac1b6624ddfe@samsung.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 13:11:06 +0900
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To:     Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>,
        Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
        Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] PM / devfreq: a few small fixes and improvements

Hi,

On 3/23/21 12:25 PM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:13 AM Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com> wrote:
>>
>> A few small fixes and improvements
>>
>> ChangeLog:
>> v1->v2:
>>  * squash a few patches
>>  * rebase to devfreq-testing
> 
> I have to rebase to devfreq-testing instead of devfreq-next because
> below two patches
> only exist in devfreq-testing.
> 5cc75e9252e9 (devfreq/devfreq-testing) PM / devfreq: Add
> devfreq_transitions debugfs file
> dc9e557845c1 PM / devfreq: Add new up_threshold and down_differential
> sysfs attrs
> My patch 5 needs change based on it according to your suggestion. So i have to
> rebase to that branch.
> 
> However, i found devfreq-testing can't build with GOV_PASSVIE enabled.
> Patch 1 fixed it. You can squash to the original one when apply.
> 
> Please help take a look at this new series.

Please rebase your patches either devfreq-next or linux-next.git
Because devfreq-testing branch is not official. 

> Thanks
> 
> Regards
> Aisheng
> 
>>  * drop two patches which are already in devfreq-next
>>
>> Dong Aisheng (6):
>>   PM / devfreq: fix build error when DEVFREQ_GOV_PASSIVE enabled
>>   PM / devfreq: Use more accurate returned new_freq as resume_freq
>>   PM / devfreq: Remove the invalid description for get_target_freq
>>   PM / devfreq: bail out early if no freq changes in devfreq_set_target
>>   PM / devfreq: governor: optimize simpleondemand get_target_freq
>>   PM / devfreq: imx8m-ddrc: remove imx8m_ddrc_get_dev_status
>>
>>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-devfreq |  5 +--
>>  drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c                     | 37 +++++++------------
>>  drivers/devfreq/governor.h                    |  2 -
>>  drivers/devfreq/governor_simpleondemand.c     | 31 ++++++++++------
>>  drivers/devfreq/imx8m-ddrc.c                  | 14 -------
>>  5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics