[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM6PR04MB4966CC15309EA6F0D78EC6BB80649@AM6PR04MB4966.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 06:11:29 +0000
From: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>
CC: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"myungjoo.ham@...sung.com" <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
"kyungmin.park@...sung.com" <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 0/6] PM / devfreq: a few small fixes and improvements
> From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 12:11 PM
>
> Hi,
>
> On 3/23/21 12:25 PM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > Hi Chanwoo,
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:13 AM Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> A few small fixes and improvements
> >>
> >> ChangeLog:
> >> v1->v2:
> >> * squash a few patches
> >> * rebase to devfreq-testing
> >
> > I have to rebase to devfreq-testing instead of devfreq-next because
> > below two patches only exist in devfreq-testing.
> > 5cc75e9252e9 (devfreq/devfreq-testing) PM / devfreq: Add
> > devfreq_transitions debugfs file
> > dc9e557845c1 PM / devfreq: Add new up_threshold and down_differential
> > sysfs attrs My patch 5 needs change based on it according to your
> > suggestion. So i have to rebase to that branch.
> >
> > However, i found devfreq-testing can't build with GOV_PASSVIE enabled.
> > Patch 1 fixed it. You can squash to the original one when apply.
> >
> > Please help take a look at this new series.
>
> Please rebase your patches either devfreq-next or linux-next.git Because
> devfreq-testing branch is not official.
Okay, then how about the patch 5 below?
[PATCH V2 5/6] PM / devfreq: governor: optimize simpleondemand get_target_freq
Should I also rebase it to devfreq-next or drop it first and then resend when your patch
merged into mainline?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/1615294733-22761-10-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@nxp.com/
Regards
Aisheng
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > Regards
> > Aisheng
> >
> >> * drop two patches which are already in devfreq-next
> >>
> >> Dong Aisheng (6):
> >> PM / devfreq: fix build error when DEVFREQ_GOV_PASSIVE enabled
> >> PM / devfreq: Use more accurate returned new_freq as resume_freq
> >> PM / devfreq: Remove the invalid description for get_target_freq
> >> PM / devfreq: bail out early if no freq changes in devfreq_set_target
> >> PM / devfreq: governor: optimize simpleondemand get_target_freq
> >> PM / devfreq: imx8m-ddrc: remove imx8m_ddrc_get_dev_status
> >>
> >> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-devfreq | 5 +--
> >> drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 37 +++++++------------
> >> drivers/devfreq/governor.h | 2 -
> >> drivers/devfreq/governor_simpleondemand.c | 31 ++++++++++------
> >> drivers/devfreq/imx8m-ddrc.c | 14 -------
> >> 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Chanwoo Choi
> Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists