linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/156] 5.10.26-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:19:24 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/156] 5.10.26-rc2 review

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:52:31PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:19:10PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.26 release.
> > There are 156 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:18:19 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 432 pass: 428 fail: 4
> Failed tests:
> 	arm:realview-pb-a8:realview_defconfig:realview_pb:mem512:arm-realview-pba8:initrd
> 	arm:realview-pbx-a9:realview_defconfig:realview_pb:arm-realview-pbx-a9:initrd
> 	arm:realview-eb:realview_defconfig:realview_eb:mem512:arm-realview-eb:initrd
> 	arm:realview-eb-mpcore:realview_defconfig:realview_eb:mem512:arm-realview-eb-11mp-ctrevb:initrd
> 
> Build failure:
> 
> kernel/rcu/tree.c:683:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'IRQ_WORK_INIT'
> 
> The patch introducing IRQ_WORK_INIT is not in v5.10.y.

That patch keeps coming back, Sasha and I have both added it multiple
times now... I'll go drop it, thanks.

greg k-h