linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/mc: make tu102_mc_intr_mask and tu102_mc_intr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1616487084-104391-1-git-send-email-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:11:24 +0800
From:   Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     bskeggs@...hat.com
Cc:     airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/mc: make tu102_mc_intr_mask and tu102_mc_intr_rearm static

Fix the following sparse warning:

drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/tu102.c:74:1: warning: symbol
'tu102_mc_intr_mask' was not declared. Should it be static?

drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/tu102.c:62:1: warning: symbol
'tu102_mc_intr_rearm' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
Changes in v2:
  -Modified the commit message.

 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/tu102.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/tu102.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/tu102.c
index 58db83e..7cf659cc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/tu102.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/tu102.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ struct tu102_mc {
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mc->lock, flags);
 }
 
-void
+static void
 tu102_mc_intr_rearm(struct nvkm_mc *base)
 {
 	struct tu102_mc *mc = tu102_mc(base);
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ struct tu102_mc {
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mc->lock, flags);
 }
 
-void
+static void
 tu102_mc_intr_mask(struct nvkm_mc *base, u32 mask, u32 intr)
 {
 	struct tu102_mc *mc = tu102_mc(base);
-- 
1.8.3.1