[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFmzuEfpN7zzKel3@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:24:08 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Alex Nemirovsky <alex.nemirovsky@...tina-access.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Jason Li <jason.li@...tina-access.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tty: serial: Add UART driver for Cortina-Access
platform
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 06:42:09PM -0800, Alex Nemirovsky wrote:
> +static struct cortina_uart_port *cortina_uart_ports;
Why is this not a per-device pointer?
> +static void __exit cortina_uart_exit(void)
> +{
> + platform_driver_unregister(&serial_cortina_driver);
> + uart_unregister_driver(&cortina_uart_driver);
> + kfree(cortina_uart_ports);
Should not need to free this here, it should be tied to the device, not
the driver.
> +}
> +
> +module_init(cortina_uart_init);
> +module_exit(cortina_uart_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Cortina-Access Inc.");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION(" Cortina-Access UART driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h b/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h
> index 62c2204..1931892 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h
> @@ -277,4 +277,7 @@
> /* Freescale LINFlexD UART */
> #define PORT_LINFLEXUART 122
>
> +/* Cortina-Access UART */
> +#define PORT_CORTINA_ACCESS 123
Also, no need for this, right? I would prefer to not add new ids if at
all possible.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists