linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] drm/radeon/r600

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:46:07 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>,
        alexander.deucher@....com, christian.koenig@....com,
        airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] drm/radeon/r600_cs: Few typo fixes

On 3/24/21 4:29 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> s/miror/mirror/
> s/needind/needing/
> s/informations/information/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>

Thanks.

> ---
>  Changes from V1:
>  Randy's finding incorporated ,i.e in one place,informations->information
>   Adjusted the subject line accordingly
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c
> index 34b7c6f16479..8be4799a98ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ extern void r600_cs_legacy_get_tiling_conf(struct drm_device *dev, u32 *npipes,
> 
> 
>  struct r600_cs_track {
> -	/* configuration we miror so that we use same code btw kms/ums */
> +	/* configuration we mirror so that we use same code btw kms/ums */
>  	u32			group_size;
>  	u32			nbanks;
>  	u32			npipes;
> @@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ static int r600_cs_parse_packet0(struct radeon_cs_parser *p,
>   *
>   * This function will test against r600_reg_safe_bm and return 0
>   * if register is safe. If register is not flag as safe this function
> - * will test it against a list of register needind special handling.
> + * will test it against a list of register needing special handling.
>   */
>  static int r600_cs_check_reg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, u32 reg, u32 idx)
>  {
> @@ -2336,7 +2336,7 @@ int r600_cs_parse(struct radeon_cs_parser *p)
>  /**
>   * r600_dma_cs_next_reloc() - parse next reloc
>   * @p:		parser structure holding parsing context.
> - * @cs_reloc:		reloc informations
> + * @cs_reloc:		reloc information
>   *
>   * Return the next reloc, do bo validation and compute
>   * GPU offset using the provided start.
> --


-- 
~Randy