[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20225c7e-1151-7865-2bc6-a1e5694c3d65@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:49:34 +0200
From: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the opp tree with the v4l-dvb tree
Thanks Stephen!
On 3/23/21 2:27 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the opp tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 08b1cf474b7f ("media: venus: core, venc, vdec: Fix probe dependency error")
>
> from the v4l-dvb tree and commit:
>
> 857219ae4043 ("media: venus: Convert to use resource-managed OPP API")
>
> from the opp tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
I don't know what is the best solution here.
Viresh, Can I take the OPP API changes through media-tree to avoid
conflicts?
--
regards,
Stan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists