Message-ID: <0edd1350-4865-dd71-5c14-3d57c784d62d@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:48:55 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     ak@...ux.intel.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Part2 PATCH 07/30] mm: add support to split the large THP
 based on RMP violation

On 3/24/21 10:04 AM, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> When SEV-SNP is enabled globally in the system, a write from the hypervisor
> can raise an RMP violation. We can resolve the RMP violation by splitting
> the virtual address to a lower page level.
> 
> e.g
> - guest made a page shared in the RMP entry so that the hypervisor
>   can write to it.
> - the hypervisor has mapped the pfn as a large page. A write access
>   will cause an RMP violation if one of the pages within the 2MB region
>   is a guest private page.
> 
> The above RMP violation can be resolved by simply splitting the large
> page.

What if the large page is provided by hugetlbfs?

What if the kernel uses the direct map to access the page instead of the
userspace mapping?

> The architecture specific code will read the RMP entry to determine
> if the fault can be resolved by splitting and propagating the request
> to split the page by setting newly introduced fault flag
> (FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT). If the fault cannot be resolved by splitting,
> then a SIGBUS signal is sent to terminate the process.

Are users just supposed to know what memory types are compatible with
SEV-SNP?  Basically, don't use anything that might map a guest using
non-4k entries, except THP?

This does seem like a rather nasty aspect of the hardware.  For
everything else, if the virtualization page tables and the x86 tables
disagree, the TLB just sees the smallest page size.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> index 7605e06a6dd9..f6571563f433 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> @@ -1305,6 +1305,70 @@ do_kern_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long hw_error_code,
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(do_kern_addr_fault);
>  
> +#define RMP_FAULT_RETRY		0
> +#define RMP_FAULT_KILL		1
> +#define RMP_FAULT_PAGE_SPLIT	2
> +
> +static inline size_t pages_per_hpage(int level)
> +{
> +	return page_level_size(level) / PAGE_SIZE;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * The RMP fault can happen when a hypervisor attempts to write to:
> + * 1. a guest owned page or
> + * 2. any pages in the large page is a guest owned page.
> + *
> + * #1 will happen only when a process or VMM is attempting to modify the guest page
> + * without the guests cooperation. If a guest wants a VMM to be able to write to its memory
> + * then it should make the page shared. If we detect #1, kill the process because we can not
> + * resolve the fault.
> + *
> + * #2 can happen when the page level does not match between the RMP entry and x86
> + * page table walk, e.g the page is mapped as a large page in the x86 page table but its
> + * added as a 4K shared page in the RMP entry. This can be resolved by splitting the address
> + * into a smaller page level.
> + */

These comments need to get wrapped a bit sooner.  Could you try to match
some of the others in the file?

> +static int handle_rmp_page_fault(unsigned long hw_error_code, unsigned long address)
> +{
> +	unsigned long pfn, mask;
> +	int rmp_level, level;
> +	rmpentry_t *e;
> +	pte_t *pte;
> +
> +	/* Get the native page level */
> +	pte = lookup_address_in_mm(current->mm, address, &level);
> +	if (unlikely(!pte))
> +		return RMP_FAULT_KILL;
> +
> +	pfn = pte_pfn(*pte);
> +	if (level > PG_LEVEL_4K) {
> +		mask = pages_per_hpage(level) - pages_per_hpage(level - 1);
> +		pfn |= (address >> PAGE_SHIFT) & mask;
> +	}

What is this trying to do, exactly?

> +	/* Get the page level from the RMP entry. */
> +	e = lookup_page_in_rmptable(pfn_to_page(pfn), &rmp_level);
> +	if (!e) {
> +		pr_alert("SEV-SNP: failed to lookup RMP entry for address 0x%lx pfn 0x%lx\n",
> +			 address, pfn);
> +		return RMP_FAULT_KILL;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Its a guest owned page */
> +	if (rmpentry_assigned(e))
> +		return RMP_FAULT_KILL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Its a shared page but the page level does not match between the native walk
> +	 * and RMP entry.
> +	 */

For these two-line comments, please try to split the text fairly evenly
between the lines.

> +	if (level > rmp_level)
> +		return RMP_FAULT_PAGE_SPLIT;
> +
> +	return RMP_FAULT_RETRY;
> +}
> +
>  /* Handle faults in the user portion of the address space */
>  static inline
>  void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
> @@ -1315,6 +1379,7 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  	struct task_struct *tsk;
>  	struct mm_struct *mm;
>  	vm_fault_t fault;
> +	int ret;
>  	unsigned int flags = FAULT_FLAG_DEFAULT;
>  
>  	tsk = current;
> @@ -1377,6 +1442,22 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  	if (hw_error_code & X86_PF_INSTR)
>  		flags |= FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If its an RMP violation, see if we can resolve it.
> +	 */
> +	if ((hw_error_code & X86_PF_RMP)) {
> +		ret = handle_rmp_page_fault(hw_error_code, address);
> +		if (ret == RMP_FAULT_PAGE_SPLIT) {
> +			flags |= FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT;
> +		} else if (ret == RMP_FAULT_KILL) {
> +			fault |= VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> +			mm_fault_error(regs, hw_error_code, address, fault);
> +			return;
> +		} else {
> +			return;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>  	/*
>  	 * Faults in the vsyscall page might need emulation.  The
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index ecdf8a8cd6ae..1be3218f3738 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -434,6 +434,8 @@ extern pgprot_t protection_map[16];
>   * @FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE: The fault is not for current task/mm.
>   * @FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION: The fault was during an instruction fetch.
>   * @FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE: The fault can be interrupted by non-fatal signals.
> + * @FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT: The fault was due page size mismatch, split the region to smaller
> + *   page size and retry.
>   *
>   * About @FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY and @FAULT_FLAG_TRIED: we can specify
>   * whether we would allow page faults to retry by specifying these two
> @@ -464,6 +466,7 @@ extern pgprot_t protection_map[16];
>  #define FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE			0x80
>  #define FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION  		0x100
>  #define FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE		0x200
> +#define FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT			0x400
>  
>  /*
>   * The default fault flags that should be used by most of the
> @@ -501,7 +504,8 @@ static inline bool fault_flag_allow_retry_first(unsigned int flags)
>  	{ FAULT_FLAG_USER,		"USER" }, \
>  	{ FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE,		"REMOTE" }, \
>  	{ FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION,	"INSTRUCTION" }, \
> -	{ FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE,	"INTERRUPTIBLE" }
> +	{ FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE,	"INTERRUPTIBLE" }, \
> +	{ FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT,	"PAGESPLIT" }
>  
>  /*
>   * vm_fault is filled by the pagefault handler and passed to the vma's
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index feff48e1465a..c9dcf9b30719 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -4427,6 +4427,12 @@ static vm_fault_t handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int handle_split_page_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> +{
> +	__split_huge_pmd(vmf->vma, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, false, NULL);
> +	return 0;
> +}

Wait a sec, I thought this could fail.  Where's the "failed to split"
path?  Why does this even return an error code if it's always 0?

>  /*
>   * By the time we get here, we already hold the mm semaphore
>   *
> @@ -4448,6 +4454,7 @@ static vm_fault_t __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	pgd_t *pgd;
>  	p4d_t *p4d;
>  	vm_fault_t ret;
> +	int split_page = flags & FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT;
>  
>  	pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
>  	p4d = p4d_alloc(mm, pgd, address);
> @@ -4504,6 +4511,10 @@ static vm_fault_t __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  				pmd_migration_entry_wait(mm, vmf.pmd);
>  			return 0;
>  		}
> +
> +		if (split_page)
> +			return handle_split_page_fault(&vmf);
> +
>  		if (pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd) || pmd_devmap(orig_pmd)) {
>  			if (pmd_protnone(orig_pmd) && vma_is_accessible(vma))
>  				return do_huge_pmd_numa_page(&vmf, orig_pmd);

Is there a reason for the 'split_page' variable?  It seems like a waste
of space.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists