[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <161671450646.3012082.10177164412320557022@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:21:46 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
peter enderborg <peter.enderborg@...y.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Add build ID to stacktraces
Quoting peter enderborg (2021-03-25 04:06:17)
> On 3/24/21 9:55 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 07:04:31PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001
> >> x3 : 0000000000000008 x2 : ffffff93fef25a70
> >> x1 : ffffff93fef15788 x0 : ffffffe3622352e0
> >> Call trace:
> >> lkdtm_WARNING+0x28/0x30 [lkdtm ed5019fdf5e53be37cb1ba7899292d7e143b259e]
> >> direct_entry+0x16c/0x1b4 [lkdtm ed5019fdf5e53be37cb1ba7899292d7e143b259e]
> > Yikes. No, please do not make the backtraces a complete mess for
> > something that serves absolutely no need.
It serves a need. Please look at the patches to understand that I'm
adding the buildid to automatically find the associated debug
information on distros.
>
> Would a "verbose" flag be acceptable solution? Something like write 1 to /sys/kernel/debug/verbose_stack to get the extra info.
>
> I think I see a need for it.
>
Or a kernel config option and a commandline parameter? That would be OK
for me as I said on v1 of this series. I'll add that in for the next
patch series given all the distaste for some more hex characters next to
the module name.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists