[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210325232328.GC1982573@xps15>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:23:28 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: ohad@...ery.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
o.rempel@...gutronix.de, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
linux-imx@....com, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: enlarge IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 05:00:42PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Hi Peng,
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 06:47:07PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > 8 is not enough when we need more, so enlarge IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX to 32,
> > and also rename it to IMX_RPROC_MEM_MAX which make more sense.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > index 6d3207ccbaef..24275429a7cc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
> > | IMX6SX_SW_M4C_NON_SCLR_RST \
> > | IMX6SX_SW_M4C_RST)
> >
> > -#define IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX 8
> > +#define IMX_RPROC_MEM_MAX 32
>
> The size of structure imx_rproc_att_imx7d and imx_rproc_att_imx6sx have
> not changed nor has there been an addition of new imx_rproc_att that would
> justify the change.
>
> It seems to me you are working on something internally and this patch is in
> preparation for that. If that is the case then please resubmit this patch with
> the rest of the code.
Reviewing the other patch in this set [1], I understand why the extension is
needed. Without a cover letter I assume the patches were not related. Next
time please add one so that I know exactly what is going on. Adding a line in
the changelog that explains why it is needed, i.e for the resource table, would
also be helpful.
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
[1]. remoteproc: imx_rproc: support remote cores booted before Linux Kernel
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
> >
> > /**
> > * struct imx_rproc_mem - slim internal memory structure
> > @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ struct imx_rproc {
> > struct regmap *regmap;
> > struct rproc *rproc;
> > const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg;
> > - struct imx_rproc_mem mem[IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX];
> > + struct imx_rproc_mem mem[IMX_RPROC_MEM_MAX];
> > struct clk *clk;
> > struct mbox_client cl;
> > struct mbox_chan *tx_ch;
> > @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len, bool *i
> > if (imx_rproc_da_to_sys(priv, da, len, &sys))
> > return NULL;
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX; i++) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < IMX_RPROC_MEM_MAX; i++) {
> > if (sys >= priv->mem[i].sys_addr && sys + len <
> > priv->mem[i].sys_addr + priv->mem[i].size) {
> > unsigned int offset = sys - priv->mem[i].sys_addr;
> > @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_addr_init(struct imx_rproc *priv,
> > if (!(att->flags & ATT_OWN))
> > continue;
> >
> > - if (b >= IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX)
> > + if (b >= IMX_RPROC_MEM_MAX)
> > break;
> >
> > priv->mem[b].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev,
> > @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_addr_init(struct imx_rproc *priv,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > - if (b >= IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX)
> > + if (b >= IMX_RPROC_MEM_MAX)
> > break;
> >
> > /* Not use resource version, because we might share region */
> > --
> > 2.30.0
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists