linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] phy: Add LVDS configuration options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:58:57 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>
Cc:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        a.hajda@...sung.com, narmstrong@...libre.com,
        Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, jonas@...boo.se,
        jernej.skrabec@...l.net, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
        shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com, agx@...xcpu.org,
        robert.chiras@....com, martin.kepplinger@...i.sm,
        robert.foss@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] phy: Add LVDS configuration options

On 18-03-21, 10:22, Liu Ying wrote:

> > Can we have these in kernel-doc style please, similar to style in linux/phy/phy.h
> 
> I take this way of in-line member documentation comment for the below 3
> reasons:
> 
> 1) Members of struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy and
> struct phy_configure_opts_dp use the same way of comment.
> The structures are defined in linux/phy/phy-mipi-dphy.h and
> linux/phy/phy-dp.h respectively.
> Aligning to them makes a bit sense, IMHO.
> 
> 2) In-line member documentation comments[1] are mentioned in kernel-doc 
> guide. It says 'The structure members may also be documented in-line
> within the definition.'.
> 
> 3) Even the 'configure' and 'validate' members of struct phy_ops use
> the same way of comment.  struct phy_ops is defined in linux/phy/phy.h.
> 
> [1] 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html#in-line-member-documentation-comments

It 'may be' but I would like all headers of a subsystem to display one
style. As I said linux/phy/phy.h use a style which we should use
everywhere.

Thanks

-- 
~Vinod