linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 37/39] signal: don't allow sending any signals to PF_IO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210325112558.1927423-37-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:25:56 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 37/39] signal: don't allow sending any signals to PF_IO_WORKER threads

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>

[ Upstream commit 5be28c8f85ce99ed2d329d2ad8bdd18ea19473a5 ]

They don't take signals individually, and even if they share signals with
the parent task, don't allow them to be delivered through the worker
thread. Linux does allow this kind of behavior for regular threads, but
it's really a compatability thing that we need not care about for the IO
threads.

Reported-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/signal.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index ef8f2a28d37c..18ed1f853439 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -833,6 +833,9 @@ static int check_kill_permission(int sig, struct kernel_siginfo *info,
 
 	if (!valid_signal(sig))
 		return -EINVAL;
+	/* PF_IO_WORKER threads don't take any signals */
+	if (t->flags & PF_IO_WORKER)
+		return -ESRCH;
 
 	if (!si_fromuser(info))
 		return 0;
-- 
2.30.1