[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210325112558.1927423-38-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:25:57 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 38/39] signal: don't allow STOP on PF_IO_WORKER threads
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
[ Upstream commit 4db4b1a0d1779dc159f7b87feb97030ec0b12597 ]
Just like we don't allow normal signals to IO threads, don't deliver a
STOP to a task that has PF_IO_WORKER set. The IO threads don't take
signals in general, and have no means of flushing out a stop either.
Longer term, we may want to look into allowing stop of these threads,
as it relates to eg process freezing. For now, this prevents a spin
issue if a SIGSTOP is delivered to the parent task.
Reported-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
kernel/signal.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 18ed1f853439..1d901a789812 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -288,7 +288,8 @@ bool task_set_jobctl_pending(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long mask)
JOBCTL_STOP_SIGMASK | JOBCTL_TRAPPING));
BUG_ON((mask & JOBCTL_TRAPPING) && !(mask & JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK));
- if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(task) || (task->flags & PF_EXITING)))
+ if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(task) ||
+ (task->flags & (PF_EXITING | PF_IO_WORKER))))
return false;
if (mask & JOBCTL_STOP_SIGMASK)
--
2.30.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists