linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 1/2] ASoC: lm49453: fix useless assignment before return

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 26 Mar 2021 17:16:18 -0500
From:   Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc:     tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        M R Swami Reddy <mr.swami.reddy@...com>,
        Vishwas A Deshpande <vishwas.a.deshpande@...com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ASoC: lm49453: fix useless assignment before return

Cppcheck warning:

sound/soc/codecs/lm49453.c:1210:11: style: Variable 'pll_clk' is
assigned a value that is never used. [unreadVariable]

  pll_clk = BIT(4);
          ^

FIXME: What is the correct fix?
	/* fll clk slection */
	pll_clk = BIT(4);
	return 0;

is the assignment redundant or the 'return 0' a mistake?

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/lm49453.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/lm49453.c b/sound/soc/codecs/lm49453.c
index eb3dd0bd80d9..fb0fb23537e7 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/lm49453.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/lm49453.c
@@ -1206,8 +1206,6 @@ static int lm49453_set_dai_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int clk_id,
 		break;
 	case 48000:
 	case 32576:
-		/* fll clk slection */
-		pll_clk = BIT(4);
 		return 0;
 	default:
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.25.1