linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] powerpc/eeh: Remove unused inline function eeh_dev_phb_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <874kgy8ptt.fsf@linkitivity.dja.id.au>
Date:   Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:08:14 +1100
From:   Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, ruscur@...sell.cc,
        oohall@...il.com, mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
        paulus@...ba.org
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] powerpc/eeh: Remove unused inline function eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic()

Hi,

> commit 475028efc708 ("powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic()")
> left behind this, so can remove it.

I had a look: the inline that you are removing here is for the
!CONFIG_EEH case, which explains why it was missed the first time.

This looks like a good change. Out of interest, what tool are you using
to find these unused inlines? If there are many more, it might make
sense to combine future patches removing them into a single patch, but
I'm not sure.

checkpatch likes this patch, so that's also good :)

Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>

Kind regards,
Daniel