linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] powerpc/eeh: Remove unused inline function eeh_dev_phb_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 Mar 2021 20:58:42 +0800
From:   YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To:     Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>, <ruscur@...sell.cc>,
        <oohall@...il.com>, <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, <paulus@...ba.org>
CC:     <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] powerpc/eeh: Remove unused inline function
 eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic()

On 2021/3/26 13:08, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> commit 475028efc708 ("powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic()")
>> left behind this, so can remove it.
> 
> I had a look: the inline that you are removing here is for the
> !CONFIG_EEH case, which explains why it was missed the first time.
> 
> This looks like a good change. Out of interest, what tool are you using
> to find these unused inlines? If there are many more, it might make
> sense to combine future patches removing them into a single patch, but
> I'm not sure.

Just use some grep skill, will do that if any.

> 
> checkpatch likes this patch, so that's also good :)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
> 
> Kind regards,
> Daniel
> .
>