linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] block: fix trivial typos in comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2831e351-0986-28d5-5eef-53edcf8f41c3@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:41:49 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@...cle.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     rdunlap@...radead.org, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block: fix trivial typos in comments

On 3/25/21 9:04 PM, Tom Saeger wrote:
> 
> s/Additonal/Additional/
> s/assocaited/associated/
> s/assocaited/associated/
> s/assocating/associating/
> s/becasue/because/
> s/configred/configured/
> s/deactive/deactivate/
> s/followings/following/
> s/funtion/function/
> s/heirarchy/hierarchy/
> s/intiailized/initialized/
> s/prefered/preferred/
> s/readded/read/
> s/Secion/Section/
> s/soley/solely/

While I'm generally happy to accept any patch that makes sense, the
recent influx of speling fixes have me less than excited. They just
add complications to backports and stable patches, for example, and
I'd prefer not to take them for that reason alone.

-- 
Jens Axboe