[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210326154519.y2ztm2fqirxejaht@dhcp-10-154-182-208.vpn.oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:45:19 -0500
From: Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@...cle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rdunlap@...radead.org, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block: fix trivial typos in comments
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:41:49AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/25/21 9:04 PM, Tom Saeger wrote:
> >
> > s/Additonal/Additional/
> > s/assocaited/associated/
> > s/assocaited/associated/
> > s/assocating/associating/
> > s/becasue/because/
> > s/configred/configured/
> > s/deactive/deactivate/
> > s/followings/following/
> > s/funtion/function/
> > s/heirarchy/hierarchy/
> > s/intiailized/initialized/
> > s/prefered/preferred/
> > s/readded/read/
> > s/Secion/Section/
> > s/soley/solely/
>
> While I'm generally happy to accept any patch that makes sense, the
> recent influx of speling fixes have me less than excited. They just
> add complications to backports and stable patches, for example, and
> I'd prefer not to take them for that reason alone.
Nod.
In that case - perhaps adding these entries to scripts/spelling.txt
would at least catch some going forward?
I can send that.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists