[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02e3bdd7-896c-2286-d090-1931c5cd807e@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:46:36 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rdunlap@...radead.org, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block: fix trivial typos in comments
On 3/26/21 9:45 AM, Tom Saeger wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:41:49AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 3/25/21 9:04 PM, Tom Saeger wrote:
>>>
>>> s/Additonal/Additional/
>>> s/assocaited/associated/
>>> s/assocaited/associated/
>>> s/assocating/associating/
>>> s/becasue/because/
>>> s/configred/configured/
>>> s/deactive/deactivate/
>>> s/followings/following/
>>> s/funtion/function/
>>> s/heirarchy/hierarchy/
>>> s/intiailized/initialized/
>>> s/prefered/preferred/
>>> s/readded/read/
>>> s/Secion/Section/
>>> s/soley/solely/
>>
>> While I'm generally happy to accept any patch that makes sense, the
>> recent influx of speling fixes have me less than excited. They just
>> add complications to backports and stable patches, for example, and
>> I'd prefer not to take them for that reason alone.
>
> Nod.
>
> In that case - perhaps adding these entries to scripts/spelling.txt
> would at least catch some going forward?
>
> I can send that.
That seems like a good idea.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists