lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:46:36 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block: fix trivial typos in comments

On 3/26/21 9:45 AM, Tom Saeger wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:41:49AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 3/25/21 9:04 PM, Tom Saeger wrote:
>>>
>>> s/Additonal/Additional/
>>> s/assocaited/associated/
>>> s/assocaited/associated/
>>> s/assocating/associating/
>>> s/becasue/because/
>>> s/configred/configured/
>>> s/deactive/deactivate/
>>> s/followings/following/
>>> s/funtion/function/
>>> s/heirarchy/hierarchy/
>>> s/intiailized/initialized/
>>> s/prefered/preferred/
>>> s/readded/read/
>>> s/Secion/Section/
>>> s/soley/solely/
>>
>> While I'm generally happy to accept any patch that makes sense, the
>> recent influx of speling fixes have me less than excited. They just
>> add complications to backports and stable patches, for example, and
>> I'd prefer not to take them for that reason alone.
> 
> Nod.
> 
> In that case - perhaps adding these entries to scripts/spelling.txt
> would at least catch some going forward?
> 
> I can send that.

That seems like a good idea.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ