[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54165ffe-dbf7-377a-a710-d15be4701f20@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:31:41 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] mm/madvise: introduce MADV_POPULATE_(READ|WRITE)
to prefault/prealloc memory
On 30.03.21 18:30, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 30.03.21 18:21, Jann Horn wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 5:01 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>>> +long faultin_vma_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>>>>> + unsigned long end, bool write, int *locked)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
>>>>> + unsigned long nr_pages = (end - start) / PAGE_SIZE;
>>>>> + int gup_flags;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + VM_BUG_ON(!PAGE_ALIGNED(start));
>>>>> + VM_BUG_ON(!PAGE_ALIGNED(end));
>>>>> + VM_BUG_ON_VMA(start < vma->vm_start, vma);
>>>>> + VM_BUG_ON_VMA(end > vma->vm_end, vma);
>>>>> + mmap_assert_locked(mm);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * FOLL_HWPOISON: Return -EHWPOISON instead of -EFAULT when we hit
>>>>> + * a poisoned page.
>>>>> + * FOLL_POPULATE: Always populate memory with VM_LOCKONFAULT.
>>>>> + * !FOLL_FORCE: Require proper access permissions.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + gup_flags = FOLL_TOUCH | FOLL_POPULATE | FOLL_MLOCK | FOLL_HWPOISON;
>>>>> + if (write)
>>>>> + gup_flags |= FOLL_WRITE;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * See check_vma_flags(): Will return -EFAULT on incompatible mappings
>>>>> + * or with insufficient permissions.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + return __get_user_pages(mm, start, nr_pages, gup_flags,
>>>>> + NULL, NULL, locked);
>>>>
>>>> You mentioned in the commit message that you don't want to actually
>>>> dirty all the file pages and force writeback; but doesn't
>>>> POPULATE_WRITE still do exactly that? In follow_page_pte(), if
>>>> FOLL_TOUCH and FOLL_WRITE are set, we mark the page as dirty:
>>>
>>> Well, I mention that POPULATE_READ explicitly doesn't do that. I
>>> primarily set it because populate_vma_page_range() also sets it.
>>>
>>> Is it safe to *not* set it? IOW, fault something writable into a page
>>> table (where the CPU could dirty it without additional page faults)
>>> without marking it accessed? For me, this made logically sense. Thus I
>>> also understood why populate_vma_page_range() set it.
>>
>> FOLL_TOUCH doesn't have anything to do with installing the PTE - it
>> essentially means "the caller of get_user_pages wants to read/write
>> the contents of the returned page, so please do the same things you
>> would do if userspace was accessing the page". So in particular, if
>> you look up a page via get_user_pages() with FOLL_WRITE|FOLL_TOUCH,
>> that tells the MM subsystem "I will be writing into this page directly
>> from the kernel, bypassing the userspace page tables, so please mark
>> it as dirty now so that it will be properly written back later". Part
>> of that is that it marks the page as recently used, which has an
>> effect on LRU pageout behavior, I think - as far as I understand, that
>> is why populate_vma_page_range() uses FOLL_TOUCH.
>>
>> If you look at __get_user_pages(), you can see that it is split up
>> into two major parts: faultin_page() for creating PTEs, and
>> follow_page_mask() for grabbing pages from PTEs. faultin_page()
>> ignores FOLL_TOUCH completely; only follow_page_mask() uses it.
>>
>> In a way I guess maybe you do want the "mark as recently accessed"
>> part that FOLL_TOUCH would give you without FOLL_WRITE? But I think
>> you very much don't want the dirtying that FOLL_TOUCH|FOLL_WRITE leads
>> to. Maybe the ideal approach would be to add a new FOLL flag to say "I
>> only want to mark as recently used, I don't want to dirty". Or maybe
>> it's enough to just leave out the FOLL_TOUCH entirely, I don't know.
>
> Any thoughts why populate_vma_page_range() does it?
Sorry, I missed the explanation above - thanks!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists