lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:04:15 -0400
From:   Simo Sorce <simo@...hat.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "crecklin@...hat.com" <crecklin@...hat.com>,
        "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fix hibernation in FIPS mode?

On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 16:46 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:14 AM Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > MD5 was marked incompliant with FIPS in 2009:
> > a3bef3a31a19 ("crypto: testmgr - Skip algs not flagged fips_allowed in fips mode")
> > a1915d51e8e7 ("crypto: testmgr - Mark algs allowed in fips mode")
> > 
> > But hibernation_e820_save() is still using MD5, and fails in FIPS mode
> > due to the 2018 patch:
> > 749fa17093ff ("PM / hibernate: Check the success of generating md5 digest before hibernation")
> > 
> > As a result, hibernation doesn't work when FIPS is on.
> > 
> > Do you think if hibernation_e820_save() should be changed to use a
> > FIPS-compliant algorithm like SHA-1?
> 
> I would say yes, it should.
> 
> > PS, currently it looks like FIPS mode is broken in the mainline:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org/msg49414.html


FYI, SHA-1 is not a good choice, it is only permitted in HMAC
constructions and only for specified uses. If you need to change
algorithm you should go straight to SHA-2 or SHA-3 based hashes.

HTH,
Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
RHEL Crypto Team
Red Hat, Inc




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ