[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d44856fc20e3b5821848ee32ea968c3ea79aa3c.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:02:34 +0000
From: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To: "andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC: linux-power <linux-power@...rohmeurope.com>,
"bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/19] gpio: support ROHM BD71815 GPOs
On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 13:54 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 1:43 PM Matti Vaittinen
> <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 13:11 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Andy, how fatal do you think these issues are? I did put these
> > comments
> > on my 'things to clean-up' list.
> >
> > If you don't see them as fatal, then I rather not resend whole
> > series
> > of 19 patches just for these. I am anyway going to rework the ROHM
> > PMIC
> > GPIO drivers which I have authored during the next couple of months
> > for
> > regmap_gpio usage. This series has most of the acks except for the
> > regulator part - so I was about to suggest to Lee that perhaps he
> > could
> > apply other but regulator stuff to MFD so I could squeeze the
> > recipient
> > list and amount of patches in series.
>
> I understand that. I'm not a maintainer, but my personal view is that
> it can be fixed in follow ups.
Thanks Andy. The series already had acks from Bartosz and Linus so I
hope they are also Ok with fixing these when reworking for regmap_gpio
(I intend to do that during 5.13-rc cycle).
Best Regards
Matti Vaittinen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists