linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel/printk.c: Fixed mundane typos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YGMevQvltf/LnJP1@alley>
Date:   Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:51:09 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>,
        john.ogness@...utronix.de
Cc:     sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, anton@...msg.org, ccross@...roid.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/printk.c: Fixed mundane typos

On Sun 2021-03-28 10:09:32, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> 
> s/sempahore/semaphore/
> s/exacly/exactly/
> s/unregistred/unregistered/
> s/interation/iteration/
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>

John,

it conflicts with the patchset removing printk safe buffers[1].
Would you prefer to queue this into the patchset?
Or should I push it into printk/linux.git, printk-rework and you would
base v2 on top of it?

Best Regards,
Petr