linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel/printk.c: Fixed mundane typos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:53:52 +0200
From:   John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Cc:     sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, anton@...msg.org, ccross@...roid.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/printk.c: Fixed mundane typos

On 2021-03-30, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> On Sun 2021-03-28 10:09:32, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>> 
>> s/sempahore/semaphore/
>> s/exacly/exactly/
>> s/unregistred/unregistered/
>> s/interation/iteration/
>> 
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>
> John,
>
> it conflicts with the patchset removing printk safe buffers[1].
> Would you prefer to queue this into the patchset?
> Or should I push it into printk/linux.git, printk-rework and you would
> base v2 on top of it?

Go ahead and push it to printk-rework. I'll base v2 on top of it.

Thanks.

John