[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dcd6a103-5220-d624-0655-b9c7146f9de5@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:31:56 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: ira.weiny@...el.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 08/10] x86/entry: Preserve PKRS MSR across exceptions
On 3/31/21 12:14 PM, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> + * To protect against exceptions having access to this memory we save the
> + * current running value and sets the PKRS value to be used during the
> + * exception.
This series seems to have grown some "we's".
The preexisting pkey code was not innocent in this regard, either. But,
please fix this up across the series in the next submission. Literally
removing "we" from this sentence doesn't change the meaning at all.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists