[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210401011540.GG3014244@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 18:15:40 -0700
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 08/10] x86/entry: Preserve PKRS MSR across exceptions
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:31:56PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 3/31/21 12:14 PM, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> > + * To protect against exceptions having access to this memory we save the
> > + * current running value and sets the PKRS value to be used during the
> > + * exception.
>
> This series seems to have grown some "we's".
I suppose it has...
>
> The preexisting pkey code was not innocent in this regard, either. But,
> please fix this up across the series in the next submission. Literally
> removing "we" from this sentence doesn't change the meaning at all.
Sure I can audit the series for this... Waiting a day for other comments.
Thanks,
Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists