[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210331094007.77aa5194@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:40:07 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tracing: Use pr_crit() instead of long fancy
messages
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:31:03 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
> This reduces kernel size by ca. 0.5 KiB.
If you are worried about size, disable tracing and it will go away
entirely. 0.5KiB is a drop in the bucket compared to what tracing adds in
size overhead.
Sorry, but NAK.
This has been very successful in stopping people from adding trace_printk()
to the kernel, and I like to keep it that way.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists