[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210402071225.GA10423@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 18:12:26 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Meng Yu <yumeng18@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
xuzaibo@...wei.com, wangzhou1@...ilicon.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shenyang39@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: hisilicon/hpre - rsa key should not be empty
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 02:13:32PM +0800, Meng Yu wrote:
> We should ensure key is not empty before we set key.
>
> Signed-off-by: Meng Yu <yumeng18@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_crypto.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_crypto.c b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_crypto.c
> index 53068d2..7cf7d80 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_crypto.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_crypto.c
> @@ -1093,6 +1093,9 @@ static int hpre_rsa_setpubkey(struct crypto_akcipher *tfm, const void *key,
> struct hpre_ctx *ctx = akcipher_tfm_ctx(tfm);
> int ret;
>
> + if (!key || !keylen)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> ret = crypto_akcipher_set_pub_key(ctx->rsa.soft_tfm, key, keylen);
Does this fix a real bug? Wouldn't the soft fallback setkey catch
this anyhow?
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists