[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7384e015-5514-d6b2-4215-beb1f4701adb@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 18:16:16 +0800
From: yumeng <yumeng18@...wei.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
<xuzaibo@...wei.com>, <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <shenyang39@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: hisilicon/hpre - rsa key should not be empty
在 2021/4/2 15:12, Herbert Xu 写道:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 02:13:32PM +0800, Meng Yu wrote:
>> We should ensure key is not empty before we set key.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Meng Yu <yumeng18@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_crypto.c | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_crypto.c b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_crypto.c
>> index 53068d2..7cf7d80 100644
>> --- a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_crypto.c
>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_crypto.c
>> @@ -1093,6 +1093,9 @@ static int hpre_rsa_setpubkey(struct crypto_akcipher *tfm, const void *key,
>> struct hpre_ctx *ctx = akcipher_tfm_ctx(tfm);
>> int ret;
>>
>> + if (!key || !keylen)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> ret = crypto_akcipher_set_pub_key(ctx->rsa.soft_tfm, key, keylen);
>
> Does this fix a real bug? Wouldn't the soft fallback setkey catch
> this anyhow?
>
I think it is not a real bug, and soft fallback setkey can always catch
the error.
But our original intention was to make it don't go to 'xxx_set_pub_key'
when the key is null, and it can return an error earlier.
But maybe it is not good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists