linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH next 2/2] misc: Add Renesas Synchronization Management Unit (SMU) support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YGcouOYV/FlROZJv@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Apr 2021 16:22:48 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
Cc:     "derek.kiernan@...inx.com" <derek.kiernan@...inx.com>,
        "dragan.cvetic@...inx.com" <dragan.cvetic@...inx.com>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 2/2] misc: Add Renesas Synchronization Management
 Unit (SMU) support

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 05:03:53PM +0000, Min Li wrote:
> > 
> > Where is patch 1/2 of this series?
> > 
> > Also, please fix up the errors that the testing bot found, and properly version
> > your patch submission so I know which one is the "latest" one to look at.
> > 
> 
> Hi Greg
> 
> The first patch is mfd so I was not sure if I should send that to you guys in the first place. 

Then the patches are independant and they should be sent as such,
otherwise it causes confusion and our tools get messed up when trying to
grab the whole "series" of patches.

Can you please fix this up and just send two independant patches?

thanks,

greg k-h