linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH next 2/2] misc: Add Renesas Synchronization Management Unit (SMU) support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 3 Apr 2021 22:06:43 +0000
From:   Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "derek.kiernan@...inx.com" <derek.kiernan@...inx.com>,
        "dragan.cvetic@...inx.com" <dragan.cvetic@...inx.com>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH next 2/2] misc: Add Renesas Synchronization Management
 Unit (SMU) support

> 
> Then the patches are independant and they should be sent as such,
> otherwise it causes confusion and our tools get messed up when trying to
> grab the whole "series" of patches.
> 
> Can you please fix this up and just send two independant patches?
> 

Hi Greg

These 2 patches are not independent. Patch 2/2 depends on patch 1/2 to build and work successfully.
They just belong to different domain, patch 1/2 belongs to MFD while patch 2/2 belongs to MISC.
That is why I wasn't sure if I should send both patches to you in the first place. Anyways, I just sent both patches again.

Thanks

Min