[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a584f3b9-ba15-a027-2496-bf757cf7ca06@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 17:45:04 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] dt-bindings: memory: tegra20: emc: Convert to
schema
01.04.2021 18:55, Rob Herring пишет:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 05:59:39PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 31.03.2021 16:40, Rob Herring пишет:
>>> On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 02:04:44 +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> Convert Tegra20 External Memory Controller binding to schema.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-emc.txt | 130 --------
>>>> .../nvidia,tegra20-emc.yaml | 294 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 294 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
>>>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-emc.txt
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-emc.yaml
>>>>
>>>
>>> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
>>>
>>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>>
>>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-emc.example.dts:33.26-55.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-0/external-memory-controller@...0f400/emc-tables@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
>>>
>>> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1460288
>>>
>>> This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
>>> series is generally the most recent rc1.
>>>
>>> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
>>> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
>>> date:
>>>
>>> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>>>
>>> Please check and re-submit.
>>>
>>
>> FYI, I'm aware about this warning and I think it's fine to skip it in
>> the case of this binding.
>
> It's not because dt_binding_check should be warning free.
>
>> The dtbs_check doesn't bother with that warning.
>
> With W=1 it will. It's off by default because there are too many of
> these warnings. Patches welcome.
Such warning could be silenced with some kind of a new pragma option in
schema which will tell what warnings are inappropriate.
But since there is no such option today, perhaps indeed should be better
to just add a dummy reg property and fix the device-trees.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists