lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YGvuQlxyorJt+ErG@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Apr 2021 07:14:42 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Pho Tran <photranvan0712@...il.com>
Cc:     johan@...nel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hung.Nguyen@...abs.com,
        Tung.Pham@...abs.com, Pho Tran <pho.tran@...abs.com>,
        Kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] USB: serial: cp210x: Add support for GPIOs on CP2108

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 11:02:38AM +0700, Pho Tran wrote:
> From: Pho Tran <pho.tran@...abs.com>
> 
> Similar to other CP210x devices, GPIO interfaces (gpiochip) should be
> supported for CP2108.
> 
> CP2108 has 4 serial interfaces but only 1 set of GPIO pins are shared
> to all of those interfaces. So, just need to initialize GPIOs of CP2108
> with only one interface (I use interface 0). It means just only 1 gpiochip
> device file will be created for CP2108.
> 
> CP2108 has 16 GPIOs, So data types of several variables need to be is u16
> instead of u8(in struct cp210x_serial_private). This doesn't affect other
> CP210x devices.
> 
> Because CP2108 has 16 GPIO pins, the parameter passed by cp210x functions
> will be different from other CP210x devices. So need to check part number
> of the device to use correct data format  before sending commands to
> devices.
> 
> Like CP2104, CP2108 have GPIO pins with configurable options. Therefore,
> should be mask all pins which are not in GPIO mode in cp2108_gpio_init()
> function.
> 
> Fix build test WARNING reported by kernel test robot.
> 
> Reported-by: Kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>

The kernel test robot did not report this needed support :(

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ