linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix the periodic wakeups of discard thread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1617700156-19719-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue,  6 Apr 2021 14:39:16 +0530
From:   Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc:     Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix the periodic wakeups of discard thread

Fix the unnecessary periodic wakeups of discard thread that happens under
below two conditions -

1. When f2fs is heavily utilized over 80%, the current discard policy
sets the max sleep timeout of discard thread as 50ms
(DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME). But this is set even when there are
no pending discard commands to be issued.

2. In the issue_discard_thread() path when there are no pending discard
commands, it fails to reset the wait_ms to max timeout value.

Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>
---
v2:
- Fix the second scenario mentioned above in commit text

 fs/f2fs/segment.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index d7076796..59efec5 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1112,6 +1112,8 @@ static void __init_discard_policy(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 				struct discard_policy *dpolicy,
 				int discard_type, unsigned int granularity)
 {
+	struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
+
 	/* common policy */
 	dpolicy->type = discard_type;
 	dpolicy->sync = true;
@@ -1131,7 +1133,9 @@ static void __init_discard_policy(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 		dpolicy->ordered = true;
 		if (utilization(sbi) > DEF_DISCARD_URGENT_UTIL) {
 			dpolicy->granularity = 1;
-			dpolicy->max_interval = DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME;
+			if (atomic_read(&dcc->discard_cmd_cnt))
+				dpolicy->max_interval =
+					DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME;
 		}
 	} else if (discard_type == DPOLICY_FORCE) {
 		dpolicy->min_interval = DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME;
@@ -1747,8 +1751,15 @@ static int issue_discard_thread(void *data)
 	set_freezable();
 
 	do {
-		__init_discard_policy(sbi, &dpolicy, DPOLICY_BG,
-					dcc->discard_granularity);
+		if (sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_HIGH ||
+			!f2fs_available_free_memory(sbi, DISCARD_CACHE))
+			__init_discard_policy(sbi, &dpolicy, DPOLICY_FORCE, 1);
+		else
+			__init_discard_policy(sbi, &dpolicy, DPOLICY_BG,
+						dcc->discard_granularity);
+
+		if (!atomic_read(&dcc->discard_cmd_cnt))
+		       wait_ms = dpolicy.max_interval;
 
 		wait_event_interruptible_timeout(*q,
 				kthread_should_stop() || freezing(current) ||
@@ -1775,10 +1786,6 @@ static int issue_discard_thread(void *data)
 		if (!atomic_read(&dcc->discard_cmd_cnt))
 			continue;
 
-		if (sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_HIGH ||
-			!f2fs_available_free_memory(sbi, DISCARD_CACHE))
-			__init_discard_policy(sbi, &dpolicy, DPOLICY_FORCE, 1);
-
 		sb_start_intwrite(sbi->sb);
 
 		issued = __issue_discard_cmd(sbi, &dpolicy);
-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.