[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210406113957.GB8277@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 13:39:57 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
seanjc@...gle.com, "open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: MIPS: rework flush_shadow_* callbacks into one
that prepares the flush
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:05:40AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/04/21 03:36, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > > I tried the merge and it will be enough for Linus to remove
> > > arch/mips/kvm/trap_emul.c. So I will leave it as is, but next time I'd
> > > prefer KVM MIPS changes to go through either my tree or a common topic
> > > branch.
> > Emmm, the TE removal series is done by Thomas, not me.:)
>
> Sure, sorry if the sentence sounded like it was directed to you. No matter
> who wrote the code, synchronization between trees is only the maintainers'
> task. :)
Sorry about the mess. I'll leave arch/mips/kvm to go via your tree then.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists