linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: MIPS: rework flush_shadow_* callbacks into one that prepares the flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c0b70a90-3388-858d-2da7-4d7b62fda6db@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Apr 2021 13:55:06 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc:     Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
        seanjc@...gle.com, "open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: MIPS: rework flush_shadow_* callbacks into one
 that prepares the flush

On 06/04/21 13:39, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:05:40AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 06/04/21 03:36, Huacai Chen wrote:
>>>> I tried the merge and it will be enough for Linus to remove
>>>> arch/mips/kvm/trap_emul.c.  So I will leave it as is, but next time I'd
>>>> prefer KVM MIPS changes to go through either my tree or a common topic
>>>> branch.
>>> Emmm, the TE removal series is done by Thomas, not me.:)
>>
>> Sure, sorry if the sentence sounded like it was directed to you.  No matter
>> who wrote the code, synchronization between trees is only the maintainers'
>> task. :)
> 
> Sorry about the mess. I'll leave arch/mips/kvm to go via your tree then.

No problem.  In this specific case, at some point I'll pull from 
mips-next, prior to sending the pull request to Linus.  It will look 
just like other KVM submaintainer pulls.

Paolo