lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:15:33 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        linux-kselftest <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/resctrl: Change a few printed messages

On 4/7/21 11:12 AM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> Hi, Shuah,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 08:33:23AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 4/5/21 6:52 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
>>> -	ksft_print_msg("%s cache miss rate within %d%%\n",
>>> -		       ret ? "Fail:" : "Pass:", max_diff_percent);
>>> +	ksft_print_msg("Check cache miss rate within %d%%\n", max_diff_percent);
>>
>> You need %s and pass in the ret ? "Fail:" : "Pass:" result for the
>> message to read correctly.
> 
> Should I keep the ":" after "Pass"/"Fail"?
> 

Yes please.

>>
>> I am seeing:
>>
>> # Check kernel support for resctrl filesystem
>>
>> It should say the following:
>>
>> # Fail Check kernel support for resctrl filesystem
> 
> i.e. should the printed messages be like the following?
> # Fail: Check kernel support for resctrl filesystem
> or
> # Pass: Check kernel support for resctrl filesystem
> 

This looks good.

thanks,
-- Shuah


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ