[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210407093844.GB11066@linux>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 11:38:44 +0200
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safe
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:33:18AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Yes. spin_unlock_irq will enable interrupts unconditionally which is
> certainly not what we want if the path is called with IRQ disabled by
> the caller.
I see, thanks for confirming.
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists